Here are some results of my measurements on X7 and X7R. I would like to share them with you because the reviews here are really helpful to me.
Runtime Plots
X7 Cool White
X7 Neutral White
X7 is unable to achieve the same brightness level on Turbo S, Turbo, and High (neither with nor without cooling). This looks like a tactic step-down and not true thermal regulation.
X7R Cool White
Clearly the *true* thermal regulation on X7R is much better than X7. The X7 and X7R runtimes on Medium also suggest that the built-in battery pack of X7R should be 3000mAh x 4.
X7 NW, X7 CW, X7R CW Outputs @ 0s and 30s
X7R Built-in Charger
Beamshot: Popcan Lights
Panorama Images:
Note that MATEMINCO MT-18 is also known as Astrolux MF-01
Animations:
Note that MATEMINCO MT-18 is also known as Astrolux MF-01
Beamshot: Comparisons
Panorama Images:
Animations:
Flicker
Also, flicker can be observed (PWM?) on all modes of X7 and X7R, except Turbo S:
Thank you.
Runtime Plots
X7 Cool White
X7 Neutral White
X7 is unable to achieve the same brightness level on Turbo S, Turbo, and High (neither with nor without cooling). This looks like a tactic step-down and not true thermal regulation.
X7R Cool White
Clearly the *true* thermal regulation on X7R is much better than X7. The X7 and X7R runtimes on Medium also suggest that the built-in battery pack of X7R should be 3000mAh x 4.
X7 NW, X7 CW, X7R CW Outputs @ 0s and 30s
X7R Built-in Charger
Beamshot: Popcan Lights
Panorama Images:
Note that MATEMINCO MT-18 is also known as Astrolux MF-01
Animations:
Note that MATEMINCO MT-18 is also known as Astrolux MF-01
Beamshot: Comparisons
Panorama Images:
Animations:
Flicker
Also, flicker can be observed (PWM?) on all modes of X7 and X7R, except Turbo S:
Thank you.
Zuletzt bearbeitet: